hidden Agenda of NASA
This story seems a little bit suspicious to me and personally along with the extent of the coverup I know NASA stands for "never a straight answer". As being currently apart of 7-10 I know moving forward that Satellite failure and loss of control of equipment will become more frequent. There is a quote from NASA which states: "NASA officials say there is a 1-in-3,200 chance that a piece of UARS satellite debris could strike and injure a person on the ground" I personally don't remember a time when there was "supposedly" a dead satellite falling to earth where stated was a chance could injure people. What is the truth behind this and might this be the "type" of story to be used to cover when the debris-filled tail of Planet X affects the Earth in a more massive extent? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRF93Nlem8E [and from another] Dead Satellite Will Fall to Earth By September's End, NASA Says http://www.space.com/12928-falling-satellite-crash-late-september-nasa.html http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/213066/20110913/nasa-falling-debris-space [Sep 13] The spacecraft, an old NASA climate probe called the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS), was decommissioned in 2005 and has been slowly losing altitude since. Soon, the 6 1/2-ton satellite will make a final uncontrolled plunge through Earth's atmosphere. [and from another] NASA states that sats could be out "for weeks" after electromagnetic activity. This looks like lining their excuses up ahead of satellite failures. [and from another] Mega Space Storm would Kill Satellites for a Decade http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128294.300 [Sep 13] When the sun belches a massive cloud of charged particles at Earth, it can damage our power grids and fry satellites' electronics. But that's not all. New calculations suggest that a solar megastorm could create a persistent radiation problem in low-Earth orbit, disabling satellites for up to a decade after the storm first hit.
What does it mean that NASA emerged with two different excuses for satellite failures and debris from the tail of Planet X, both dated the same day, September 13, 2011. In addition to the "mega space storm" hypothesis, we are reminded that mankind's satellites die and crash to Earth. Debris from the tail of Planet X is to be assumed to be satellite debris, or so NASA hopes. Suddenly there are warnings from NASA that mankind's satellites might all go kaput, all due to the Sun, a solar flare.
Satellite failure is something we have been warning about since the start of the ZetaTalk saga in 1995. Have they suddenly started taking the ZetaTalk message seriously? That both these articles emerged on the same date shows that NASA is trying to use media access to foist their lies on the public. NASA is a pawn of the establishment and as such lies to the public about the approach of Planet X, which has been in the inner solar system since 2003, per our predictions and per the extensive documentation on the ZetaTalk website.
The establishment struggles with how to lie most effectively, and likes to get out ahead of the Earth changes we have predicted. Now that their lie about the comet Elenin has been taken from them, they cannot have their pawns blaming Elenin for all the Earth changes anticipated to be unfolding in the near future. What to do? They are returning to blaming the Sun, an old favorite, with a hypothetical "mega space storm" that would kill satellites for a decade! Has such a storm ever occurred? No, but as long as NASA has an credentials with the public, they can lie freely and hope to get away with it.